 |
|
Pastoral Position
Paper - Ben Merkle
“But this is
the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those
days, says the Lord: I will put My law in their minds, and write
it on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My
people. No more shall every man teach his neighbor, and every man
his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they shall all know Me,
from the least of them to the greatest of them, says the Lord. For
I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin I will remember no
more” (Jer. 31:33-34).
This
passage is often cited as a strong argument against the practise
of paedo-baptism. Jeremiah tells us that there will be something
different about the New Covenant. In the New Covenant everyone
will be regenerate, eliminating the category of unregenerate
covenant member (which had been a possibility in the Old
Covenant). This initially can appear to be a strong case for the
Baptistic position. With the New Covenant now open only to
regenerate souls, the church must be careful who it applies the
sign of the Covenant to. It makes sense to guard the sign and seal
of the Covenant from unbelievers by waiting until someone has
professed faith.
There are two difficulties with this interpretation. First the
Baptist assumes that all of Jeremiah 31 describes the New Covenant
from its very beginning. Second, the Baptist fails to notice that
Jeremiah is prophesying, not giving a didactic message.
The Culmination of
the Kingdom
The Baptistic take on Jeremiah 31 assumes that the entire passage
is in effect from the very inception of the New Covenant. But
Jeremiah is describing the fulfillment of the New Covenant. He is
not describing the New Covenant only as it will first appear
(although he does prophesy its initiation), but he also describes
the long term fulfillment of a postmillennial hope.
First, we know
that this prophecy begins its fulfillment with the life, death,
and resurrection of Christ. The author of Hebrews writes, “But now
He has obtained a more excellent ministry, inasmuch as He is also
Mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better
promises. For if the first covenant had been faultless, then no
place would have been sought for a second” (Heb. 8:6-7). He then
continues by citing Jeremiah 31:31-34. The New Covenant of
Jeremiah was considered to have already begun at the time of the
writing of the book of Hebrews. In this covenant God promises to
the Israelites “their sins and lawless deed I will remember no
more.” This language is reflected at the first Lord’s Supper.
“Then He took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them,
saying, ‘Drink from it, all of you. For this is My blood of the
New Covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins’”
(Mat. 26:27-28).
Clearly, the
promised New Covenant was initiated by Christ in the first
century. However, Jeremiah’s prophecy does not describe only the
advent of the covenant, but also the sort of affect it will have
on the world. God’s Spirit will be poured out and all of Israel
will turn to God. He continues in chapter 33, describing how the
nation of Israel will be restored, will be ruled by a “Branch of
righteousness,” and will multiply, becoming a number that can’t be
counted. “As the host of heaven cannot be numbered, nor the sand
of the sea measured, so will I multiply the descendents of David
My servant and the Levites who minister to Me” (33:22). The New
Covenant of which Jeremiah prophesies culminates in an eternal
nation of Israel, that can’t be counted, and all regenerate.
Jeremiah’s
prophecy of the restoration is echoed by Ezekiel 37. In this
passage the renewal of Israel is portrayed by a valley of dry
bones coming back to life. God declares, “...you shall know that I
am the Lord, when I have opened your graves, O My people, and
brought you up from your graves. I will put My Spirit in you, and
you shall live, and I will place you in your own land” (Ezek.
37:13-14). This passage is followed by the promise of an eternal
King to rule over the nation, David.
This kingdom was
established by Christ, and given to the disciples of the early
church. “Do not fear, little flock, for it is your Father’s good
pleasure to give you the kingdom” (Luke 12:32). The declaration of
this kingdom was one of the main reasons behind the persecution of
the disciples. “Jason has harbored them, and these are all acting
contrary to the decrees of Caesar, saying there is another
king—Jesus” (Acts 17:7). The last we hear of Paul, he is busy
“preaching the kingdom of God and teaching the things which
concern the Lord Jesus Christ with all confidence...” (Acts
28:31).
Jeremiah’s prophecy of the kingdom did not find its fulfillment
all at once. Jesus explained how the kingdom was to come. “Then He
said, ‘What is the kingdom of God like? And to what shall I
compare it? It is like a mustard seed, which a man took and put in
his garden; and it grew and became a large tree, and the birds of
the air nested in its branches.’ And again He said, ‘To what shall
I liken the kingdom of God? It is like leaven, which a woman took
and hid in three measures of meal till it was all leavened’” (Luke
13:18-21). We are promised that this kingdom will begin small and
then grow to fill the earth.
When Jeremiah
describes the New Covenant church consisting of regenerate people
only, he is clearly describing the covenant people at the
fulfillment of the New Covenant. So while it is true that Jeremiah
teaches that there will be a time in the New Covenant where all of
the covenant members will be regenerate, this is referring to the
culmination of the New Covenant, not its inception. But the fact
does remain that at the culmination of God’s covenantal work,
which was begun with the life, death, and resurrection of Christ,
we will be left with an entirely regenerate covenantal people.
The
Alternative
Let’s consider the alternative for a moment. The baptistic
position generally holds that Jeremiah is describing how the New
Covenant will look from the beginning (as opposed to its
culmination). Depending on one’s view of baptism, this will lead
us to one of several problems.
First of all,
either baptism joins one to the New Covenant or it doesn’t. If
being baptized does not join someone to the New Covenant, then
there is no real problem with baptizing babies. Jeremiah says that
everyone in the New Covenant will be regenerate, but if baptism
doesn’t join a person to the New Covenant, then the fact that
someone is not regenerate shouldn’t stop us from baptizing the
person. They may very well be unregenerate, but the baptism
doesn’t bring them into the New Covenant. The Baptist wants to
argue that baptizing babies is inconsistent with Jeremiah 31, but
if Jeremiah 31 isn’t talking about baptism, then there is no
contradiction.
However, if one
claims that baptism does make the recipient a member of the
covenant, then Jeremiah doesn’t teach baptistic theology. Rather,
this passage teaches baptismal regeneration. The Baptist
interprets Jeremiah 31 as if it was a pastoral epistle instructing
us. But Jeremiah is prophesying . For instance there is a
difference between being told to “be perfect” and being told that
“you will be perfect.” The first is a command that we are to
strive towards in our sanctification. We know that we won’t get
all the way there in this life, but we are to be working towards
that end. The second however is a promise of what will be. We have
this promise, that in the resurrection we will be made perfect.
In Jeremiah 31,
the Baptist reads the passage to teach that we are to strive
towards getting a closer correlation between the number of people
who have received the sign of the covenant and the number of the
elect. But this reading has the hidden assumption that Jeremiah is
a pastoral epistle, telling us what we are to be striving for. But
Jeremiah is prophesying. He is telling us what will be. When
Jeremiah 31 finds its fulfillment there will be no inconsistency
between the Covenant sign and the number of the elect. The
Jeremiah passage is not giving us theological instruction.
The Baptist Fence
Taking several steps back, we see that the Baptist position
ignores the whole point of this passage. Jeremiah is promising
that a time will come when there will no longer be a dichotomy
between the outer and the inner man. The Baptist would have us
interpret this passage to imply that at the fulfillment of
Jeremiah 31 the church will need to be much more careful about who
they baptize (hence the prohibition of baptizing babies). But the
sense that Jeremiah gives is drastically different. The main point
of this passage is not that we ought to be baptizing far fewer
people (and cautiously examining them to make sure that no
unregenerate souls get through), but rather, when this prophecy
finds its fulfillment, we will have run out of people to baptize.
Jeremiah describes a time when baptizing an unregenerate person
will be an impossibility. “No more shall every man teach his
neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, ‘know the Lord,’ for
they all shall know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of
them, says the Lord” (31:34). At the fulfillment of this prophecy
we could turn a hose on a stadium filled with people and not hit
an unbeliever.
To the Least
As this prophecy finds its fulfillment in the New Covenant
kingdom, it will become more and more difficult to live next door
to an unregenerate soul. But the promise is even greater than
that. The Lord promises that they shall all know him, and then He
specifies “from the greatest to the least.” It certainly is ironic
that, in order to attack paedo-baptism, one would pick a passage
that describes the expanding of the covenant specifically to “the
least.” The Hebrew word translated “least” in this passage is the
word Katan. BDB defines this adjective as “small, young,
unimportant.” Katan is the word that Joseph’s brothers use to
describe Benjamin in Genesis 42-44, translated—“youngest.” The
same word describes Jerubaal’s “youngest” son in Judges 9:5,
David, the “youngest” brother in 1 Samuel 16:11, and Jehoahaz, the
“youngest” of the sons of Jehoram in 2 Chronicles 21:17. The
phrase “least to the greatest” is used throughout Scripture to
describe something all encompassing, including the oldest to the
youngest. Jeremiah 31 promises an expansion of the Covenant to the
young, not a retraction of it.
The New Covenant
promises the gradual expansion of the kingdom of God throughout
this world. The effects of this covenant will be wide, covering
the entire earth. But not only will the New Covenant have width,
but it will also have depth, reaching from the Greatest to the
Least. |