 |
|
Pastoral Position Paper - Chris
Comis
Part
V: New Covenant Fulfillment
The
first hermeneutical principle we need to keep in mind when we come
to the newer covenant, is that the new covenant is not the
annihilation of the old. Jesus
tells us this in Matt 5:17-19, “Do not think that I came to
destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to
fulfill. For
assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot
or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is
fulfilled. Whoever
therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and
teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven;
but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great
in the kingdom of heaven.” The
time of the new covenant is the fulfillment of the old covenant,
not its destruction.[i]
We are now living in the post-70 AD fulfillment of the old
covenant. We are
living post-holocaust, but also post-Pentecost.
We now have the Spirit of God dwelling in us (and in the
midst of the Church) with greater power and efficacy in order to
guide us into all truth. All
this to say, when it comes to applying old covenant
examples/principles to new covenant life, we should be much
better at applying these to our lives than any saint in the
old covenant administration (this theme of “much better” is
one of the main points of the book of Hebrews about new covenant
life).
Jesus
is great at helping us to keep the Law and the Prophets in
perspective. And He
does quite a bit of this in His Sermon on the Mount.
So what does Jesus have to say about clothing here?
Quite a bit actually:
"Therefore
I say to you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or
what you will drink; nor about your body, what
you will put on. Is not life more than food and the body more than clothing?
Look at the birds of the air, for they neither sow nor reap
nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feeds them.
Are you not of more value than they?
Which of you by worrying can add one cubit to his stature?
So why do you worry
about clothing?
Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they
neither toil nor spin; and yet I say to you that even Solomon in
all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.
Now if God so clothes
the grass of the field, which today is, and tomorrow is thrown
into the oven, will He not
much more clothe you,
O you of little faith? Therefore
do not worry, saying, 'What shall we eat?' or 'What shall we
drink?' or 'What shall we wear?'
For after all these things the Gentiles seek.
For your heavenly Father knows that you need all these
things. But seek first
the
kingdom
of
God
and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added to you.
Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will
worry about its own things. Sufficient
for the day is its
own trouble.” (Matt 6:25-34)
So here we
see Jesus giving us a proper and healthy perspective on clothing.
But notice, the fundamental heart issue here is one of
worry. We should not
be worrying ourselves to death about food, clothing, and shelter
– or indeed, about life itself.
There is a kind of life which is more than any or all of
these things. A kind
of life which is more, but
it isn’t less. Nowhere
in this passage does Jesus say that life is some inner mystical
experience that can be obtained without
food, clothing, and shelter. Life
(and specifically eternal life) is so much more than the everyday
worry we all face when it comes to trying to figure out what
we’re going to eat for breakfast; what we’re going to have for
dinner; what we’re going to wear in the morning when its 20
degrees below. Eternal
life is so much more than the bare essentials of bare existence,
but not less. And
worrying about obtaining the bare essentials will only add to our
troubles, not relieve them.
We need to
notice the driving principle behind all this – we are to “seek
first the
kingdom
of
God
and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added to
you.” This is not a
suggestion, but a command. We
are commanded by the Lord Himself to seek first the
kingdom
of
God
and His righteousness.
But notice the little promise of blessing tacked onto the
end there: “and all these things shall be added to you.” These
things will not be taken from us.
It’s not as if the
kingdom
of
God
and His righteousness will have nothing to do with such earthly
matters and concerns. Quite
the contrary. God in
His kingdom and righteousness will bestow these things upon us.
So what are
the implications of this? First
off, God’s kingdom and righteousness should be the bedrock, the
foundation, for the food we eat and the clothing we wear.
In other words, this doesn’t mean that the only food and
clothing at our disposal must now be immaterial and invisible.
As if we no longer need earthly food and clothing; and all
we need to live and survive now are ethereal hot dogs and pants.
God’s kingdom and righteousness are very material and
very visible. We know
this because Christ Himself was very material and very visible,
and He was the embodiment of God’s kingdom and righteousness.
So our food and clothing must also be very material and
visible because these too have been added to us on the basis of
God’s kingdom and righteousness in Christ.
So what is
the big point with all this? We
must primarily pursue God’s visible kingdom and righteousness in
Christ, and we must also pursue the visible food and clothing
which is the fruit thereof. But
we are to do so without worry.
Part
VI: Practical Fulfillment
So
practically speaking, what exactly is kingdom clothing?
If there is such a thing as righteous clothing, then is
there also unrighteous clothing?
How can we know the difference?
I think
before we can answer these questions concerning the particulars of
clothing, we need to consider the more all-embracing issues of the
heart. Paul tells us
in 1 Tim 6:6-8 that, “[G]odliness with contentment is great
gain. For we brought
nothing into this world,
and it is certain
we can carry nothing out. And
having food and clothing, with these we shall be content.”
Contentment is the big ‘C’ on the eye-chart for Paul
when it comes to issues like clothing (the little ‘c’ on the
eye-chart!). We must
learn to be content with the clothing God has given us.
This ties in well with what was said earlier by Jesus about
not worrying about our clothing.
So Paul is just elaborating a bit on what Jesus already
taught us. Contentment
is at the heart of godliness.
Godliness is what we live for as subjects in God’s
righteous kingdom. So
contentment with godliness is also at the heart of what we ought
to be striving for when it comes to our clothing.
So here are some really basic questions every Christian
needs to be asking themselves when it comes to clothing issues:
·
Am I content with the clothing I have?
·
Do I constantly want clothing beyond what I actually own,
or can even afford?
·
Do I covet other people’s clothing?
·
Am I constantly seeking to make a connection between my
clothing and my godliness?
·
Am I seeking to adorn myself with clothing which also
adorns God’s kingdom and His righteousness?
So the big
point we need to glean from what Paul says here is that no matter
what kind or style of clothing we put on, if it is not put on with
godliness and contentment, then it becomes just as polluted as our
hearts. This goes just
as much for the suit-and-tie look as it does for the baggy-pants
and Motley Crew t-shirt look.
Godliness and contentment is the heart of the matter.
But this is not the same thing as saying that godliness and
contentment are all that
matters. The kind
and style of clothing we put on does matter.
It matters like the rings a husband and wife put on, and
which are a visible extension of their marriage covenant.
Like wedding rings, clothing styles are not symbolically
neutral. Just as
wedding rings point to a covenantal reality beyond themselves, so
do clothing styles. Clothing
styles connect individuals and whole cultures to greater
covenantal allegiances. So
the question is not whether
your clothing style connects you to some allegiance greater than
the clothes themselves, but
which allegiance do your clothes connect you to.
So this is
where the rubber meets the road with the whole clothing issue.
When it comes to particular styles of clothing, how can we
really know what is godly versus what isn’t?
How can we really know what is of God’s righteous
kingdom, and what isn’t? This
is where lots of wisdom and care are needed.
This is also where lots of patience and long-suffering are
needed. These are not
easy questions to answer, but nonetheless, they are questions we
as individuals and as a church must wrestle with and learn how to
answer.[ii]
Notice that Paul does just this for Timothy in his first
epistle to the same. He
tells Timothy, “I desire therefore that the men pray everywhere,
lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting; in like manner
also, that the women adorn
themselves in modest apparel, with propriety and moderation, not
with braided hair or gold or pearls or costly clothing.”
(1 Tim 2:8-9)[iii]
Paul is
giving Timothy instruction on how and what to instruct women on
concerning their clothing. He
starts out by giving Timothy some general principles to go by:
adornment, modesty, propriety, and moderation.[iv]
But he doesn’t stop there with the general principles.
Notice what he goes on to do.
He goes on to mention some very particular styles, physical
substances, and price tags. It’s
one thing if Paul had simply mentioned some general abstract
virtues and left it at that. General
virtues are much more malleable in the minds and hearts of
sinners. “What is
the inner essence of modestiness anyway?”
“Does propriety mean my skirt can be 3 inches from my
knee cap instead of 4?” “What
if the price tag says $99.99, rather than $100?”
Paul knew the vain-wranglings of the human heart, and how
every human heart has a team of covenant lawyers that like to
debate the inner essences of things ad
nauseam. Men (and
women) will argue with anything in order to get their way.
So what does Paul do? He
goes on to list some very particular “no-nos”: braided hair,
gold, pearls, and costly clothing.
Now as modern evangelicals we look at this and say,
“Paul, your just reverting back to your pre-Christian days of
pharisaical religiosity. How
dare you give the women of your day a list of things they ought
not to be wearing. Who
do you think you are? You
male chauvinist pig-dog!” Here’s
the point: Paul understood his culture and his audience well enough that he could
actually put together a list of clothing items that were to remain
off-limits for the ladies.
So how
should we apply Paul’s little list of “thou shall not wears”
to our day and age? This
is a great question and one we need to wrestle with.
First off,
I don’t believe we are required to woodenly apply Paul’s list
of “no-wears” to our day and age.
Paul was seeking to apply wisdom to the cultural context of
his day, and therefore sought to apply A-M-P-M wisdom to the
particular clothing styles of his day.
For some reasons not totally clear to us, these particular
articles of clothing violated A-M-P-M wisdom.[v]
So how should we then live in light of knowing all this?
We, as a Church and as distinct local churches, need to
learn and grow in our A-M-P-M wisdom.
Overseers and elders need to become as “fashion savvy”
as Paul was, so that they can apply wisdom in this area – so
that they can come up with lists of fashion dos and don’ts.
But of course, the standard for what is fashionable versus
what is not would be the same four “fashion virtues” Paul gave
to Timothy. Only the
particular application of these virtues would be different.
[i]
The new heavens and new earth had their official-legal
beginning in the Incarnation of the Messiah.
Christ Himself was the embodiment of the new heavens
and new earth. So
the official-legal
passing away of the old heaven and earth occurred on the cross
around 30 AD (“It is finished”).
The resurrection of Christ then marked the eschatological
beginning of the new heavens and new earth.
But the historical-chronological
beginning of the new heavens and new earth didn’t occur
until 70 AD. This
is why I would also argue that the “thousand years” of
Revelation 20 began historically in the year 70 AD.
The thousand years began in 70 AD, but their
eschatological fulfillment should not be confused with a
literal chronological fulfillment (contra the Chiliasts).
In other words, the fulfillment of the thousand years
has more to do with priestly living and kingly reigning with
Christ on earth (as it is in heaven), than with a literal
chronological sequence of 365,000 revolutions of the earth
around the sun.
So
God put a 70-year overlap between the beginning of the
fulfillment of the old covenant (at the Incarnation) and the
beginning of the fulfillment of the new covenant (at the
destruction of the
Temple
in 70 AD). He also
put a 40-year overlap between the final legal fulfillment of
the old covenant on the cross and the final legal fulfillment
of God’s wrath on old covenant
Israel
in the holocaust of 70 AD.
I know this probably sounds pretty complicated, but
welcome to the very difficult (but rewarding) study of
historico-redemptive theology.
It’s also kind of manly, too!
[ii]
Keep in mind, the Church needs to grow in wisdom in the area
of clothing, if for no other reason than she must become the
leader for the world even in this arena.
Indeed, the Church is the leader (for the world) for
better or for worse, and always has been since the first
church was planted in the east of
Eden
. But when the
Church decides she doesn’t want to lead in some cultural
endeavor, and then the world will come along and fill the
void. We saw this
in the pre-flood world when the city of
Cainite
man took the lead in developing land and commerce (4:20),
music (v.21), and even the crafts and trades (v.22).
The whole earth is now our garden and we are the new
priests, kings, and prophets that are sent out into the world
to cultivate and guard her.
As a postmillennialist, I also believe in the
eschatological coalescence of Church and culture.
Or to put it more succinctly, I affirm that Christ is
moving history towards the consummation of all holy cultural artifacts into His Church/City.
But even at the end of history, when all things are
consummated, this
Holy
City
will still have “gates” outside of which will remain any
unholy thing (Rev 22:14-15).
[iii]
The Greek here is really interesting.
It could be translated as “that the women cosmos
themselves in cosmic apparel/clothing;” or better, “that
the women order themselves in orderly clothing.”
The same root word is used for “adorn” and
“modest” – the Greek word ‘cosmos’.
But then Paul goes on to add a little more flavor to
this mix. He goes
on to describe how this cosmic clothing is to be worn, with aidos and sophrosune –
that is, with a “sense of shame” and “self-control.”
I don’t believe the kind of shame Paul is referring
to here is equivalent to a form of public humiliation.
Rather, the kind of shame Paul is referring to is the
shame Adam and Eve should have felt in the garden after they
ate of the tree of judgment (see above under Part I).
In the King James it is translated as
“shamefacedness,” but in most modern English translations
as “propriety,” “modesty,” or “decency.”
So a woman needs to learn how to dress in a way that is
both adorning and shameful.
I’m just glad I’m not a woman because I have no
idea what this should look like in our day and age!
[iv]
These are four core virtues that every
Christian woman should have pinned to her wardrobe door, so
that every time she goes to get dressed she is reminded of
them. A-M-P-M
right there, next to the full-body mirror on your vanity.
Even if you don’t understand all the ins-and-outs of
what Paul is getting at with these virtues, it’s still good
to have them in front of your face as a constant reminder of
what God expects of you. Pray
for wisdom in these areas, and God will give you greater and
greater ability to understand both the importance of these
virtues and how to apply them to your life; and in particular,
to the clothes you put on every day.
[v]
I realize there are plenty of scholars and biblical
commentators who will bring up some cultural fad, fashion, or
context in order to show why Paul forbade these particular
items. I don’t
have any problems with brining in these kinds of
extra-biblical information to shed light on the Scriptures.
But my point remains regardless of what the particular
situation was like: Paul had enough A-M-P-M wisdom to know
exactly what was off-limits when it came to the clothing
issue.
|