 |
|
Pastoral Position
Paper - Ben Alexander
INTRODUCTION
Hughes Oliphant Old, when commenting on the life of William
Perkins (1558-1602) wrote, “Speech is gracious when it comes
from a grace-filled heart.”
Perkins exemplified a beautiful symmetry between learning
and godliness. His
gracious speech is a model for every pastor.
How can pastors speak the truth in love?
How can we correct and encourage with grace?
That is the subject of this paper.
Colossians 4:6 says, “Let your speech
always be with grace, as though seasoned with salt, so that you
will know how you should respond to each person.”
In Matthew Henry’s Concise Commentary he says of this
verse:
Even what is only carelessness may cause a lasting
prejudice against the truth. Let all discourse be discreet and
seasonable, as becomes Christians. Though it be not always of
grace, it must always be with grace. Though our discourse be of
that which is common, yet it must be in a Christian manner. Grace
is the salt which seasons our discourse, and keeps it from
corrupting. It is not enough to answer what is asked, unless we
answer aright also.
Matthew Henry is saying that even though we may be speaking
hard things with someone, it must be done from a heart of love and
with a view towards restoration and edification.
Proverbs is rich with instruction on this.
Gracious speech, it tells us, is as apples of
gold in settings of silver (Proverbs 25:11). Right
words must be set in the right
contexts. Whatever the
context, whatever matter a pastor might find himself addressing,
it must be seasoned with salt.
It is to be winsome, healing, attractive and pleasant.
“Though it be not always of
grace, it must always be with
grace,” Henry says.
SINFUL ANGER IS THE PROBLEM
One of the challenges of pastoral ministry is the need to
address sin from the pulpit without sounding like an angry father.
It can be hard not to rage at people and their sin,
especially if that sin is really tracking emotional “mud” in
your family’s spiritual living room. But if a man addresses sin
with sinful anger, he acts hypocritically and incites disrespect.
On the other hand, a man addressing sin
who is only angry at what God is angry with, will usually gain
respect.
I must confess, I wrote out an exhortation to the
congregation once that was produced more from annoyance than the
grace of the gospel. Thankfully,
I never delivered it! I
wrote on the importance of respecting other people by returning
phone calls and e-mails. I
still think this is a very important way to show respect and it is
often done in a sloppy manner today, but the problem was, I was
annoyed.
A NEGATIVE EXAMPLE FROM CHURCH HISTORY
There is a time and a place to address sin specifically
from the pulpit. But
if you have been counseling someone that week, and you address
their sin in a specific way the following Sunday, it may reveal
frustration in your heart. At
the least, it could indicate a lack of grace in your heart towards
those people and their struggles.
A law-like spirit that is ready to pounce and judge with
great enthusiasm and passion in the pulpit is dangerous.
J.H. Merle d’Aubigne, a 19th Century
Reformation historian, told a story of a fiery man named Robert
Barnes who preached on one occasion more from a law-like zeal than
a grace-empowered zeal.
But nothing compromises the gospel so much as a disposition
turned towards outward things.
The prior, as he went into the pulpit, thought only of
Wolsey. (Wolsey was
one of the chief enemies of the English Reformation.) As the
representative of the popedom of
England
, the cardinal was the great obstacle to the Reformation.
Barnes preached from the epistle for the day:
Rejoice in the Lord
alway. But instead
of announcing Christ and the joy of the Christian, he imprudently
declaimed against the luxury, pride, and diversions of the
churchmen, and everybody understood that he aimed at the cardinal.
He described those magnificent palaces, that brilliant
suite, those scarlet robes, and pearls, and gold, and precious
stones, and all the prelate’s ostentation, so little in keeping
(said he) with the stable of
Bethlehem
. Two fellows of
King’s College, Robert Ridley and Walter Preston, relations of
Tunstall, bishop of
London
, who were intentionally among the congregation, noted down in
their tablets the prior’s imprudent expressions.
It was not hard to prove the ostentation of the servants of
the Roman Catholic Church. The
problem was Barne’s spirit. His
message diverted attention from the person of Christ and onto attacking
the prelates.
Shepherds are to mend the sheep, not yank on their
disjointed bones. We
should not hold their mistakes over them in harsh judgment.
One way to avoid being an abusive shepherd is to remember
that ministers, like Christ, do nothing on their own authority.
Rather, they do what the Father tells them.
Jesus always did what his Father told him.
Prophets, also, submitted their lives and words to God.
Jesus said repeatedly in the gospels that He does not speak
on His own authority but only as the Father tells Him.
Ultimately, I think this reflects the 2nd person
of the Trinity who always delights in and loves to submit to the
Father. And the Father
loves to bestow honor and glory on the Son in return.
Indeed, He declared, “This is My Son, in whom I am well
pleased” (Matt. 3:17). The
Scriptures say that Moses was faithful in all his house, and that
he received the law from angels (Acts 7:38).
Even the Holy Spirit does not speak for
himself, but only what he hears.
“But when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide
you into all the truth; for He will not speak on His own
initiative, but whatever He hears, He will speak; and He will
disclose to you what is to come” (John 16:13). Trinitarian
love and submission is seen here.
So we also live and speak under authority ourselves.
We live under the authority of the Word as the ultimate
authority. But we also
live under the authoritative tradition of our forefathers in the
faith. We have
forefathers in the faith like the New England Puritans who built
their society under God’s Word, after the tradition of Calvin in
Geneva
. We also have a great
heritage in historic biblical Christianity as expressed by the
Magisterial Reformers and the Scots-Irish Presbyterians who all
lived under God’s authority, that is, His Word.
Tradition is not the final authority, only Scripture has
that place, but godly tradition is
an authority. We
and our forefathers live together under the supreme authority of
the Word of God.
WE ARE UNDER AUTHORITY TO USE THE ROD LIKE
JESUS
So we are under authority.
We speak nothing to our children or our congregations that
really matters in life on our own authority and presumption.
We speak the words of life to them.
When we spank our children we are loving, firm, clear, and
judicial like our Father is with us.
We should not emotionally manipulate and threaten, but deal
covenantally with them by laying out plainly, “This is the way,
walk in it.” Tell
them the specific sin they committed, tell them the verse which
describes their disobedience, and name the sin.
The rod and the law will not save.
Nor will any imperfect moral-rules-keeping save your
children. “But rend
your heart little child,” we should say.
“Look in faith to Jesus, your covenantal God, who is for
you. Confess your sin
and take up God’s promises for you and for all those whom God
will call.” We show
to our children that we, like Jesus was to the Father, are people
under the Book. We do
not rest on our words and authority but on Jesus the true Prophet.
And then we lead them with integrity by calling them to
live under submissive authority as we do. This model in the
family is to be lived out in the flock.
In Ezekiel 34:10 it says, “Thus says the
Lord God, ‘Behold, I am against the shepherds, and I will demand
My sheep from them and make them cease from feeding sheep.
So the shepherds will not feed themselves anymore, but I
will deliver My flock from their mouth, so that they will not be
food for them.” This
is a striking passage about how many priests and teachers of
Israel
(“shepherds”) were “eating” their people instead of
actually feeding them. The
word of the Lord came to Ezekiel to say to them of their
wantonness and wickedness, “You eat the fat and clothe
yourselves with the wool, you slaughter the fat sheep without
feeding the flock” (Ezekiel 34:3).
A minister who is not interested in “strengthening the
sickly,” “healing the diseased,” “binding up the
broken,” and “seeking the lost sheep,” (v. 4) is not a
shepherd like the ultimate shepherd, the Lord Jesus.
A man who is abusive and angry in the pulpit is like those
evil teachers in
Israel
. He takes advantage
of the fact that he is the only one that gets to yammer up there
without anyone to interrupt him. These
shepherds would tread down the green pastures and muddy the clear
and fresh waters where the sheep liked to drink.
But Jesus did not do this.
YHWH said that “I will set over them one shepherd, My
servant David, and he will feed them;
he will feed them himself
and be their shepherd”
(Ezekiel 34:23). This is a fulfillment of Jesus’ words in
John 6:51: “I am the
living bread that came down out of heaven; if anyone eats of this
bread, he will live forever; and the bread also which I will give
for the life of the world is My flesh.”
Ezekiel 34:14 prophesied of Jesus’ feeding of the
five-thousand when it said, “I will feed them in a good pasture,
and their grazing ground will be on the mountain heights of
Israel
. There they will lie
down on good grazing ground and feed in rich pasture on the
mountains of
Israel
.” Jesus uses the
rod as a weapon against wolves, and He also knows how to be
gracious and gentle. He
knows the sheep and He knows the wolves.
He knows how to discipline and lead all His own with the
perfect balance of both tender and rough grace. Praise
God for Jesus’ ministry to our souls who always leads us
“beside quiet waters,” and both His rod and staff are comforts
to those who hear His voice.
|